![]() Did GOG do anything to either explain or just acknowledge the issue? No. ![]() Was the miscommunicated statement legally binding (at least for US customers)? Yes. Except it was perfectly grammatically correct to use "a portrait pack" in reference to the existing Portrait Pack DLC, especially considering the sentence's structure following with not only the other paid DLC, but being set in a way that makes is ambiguous if the "DLC" word there applies to just second listing, or both packs. Nitpicky for sure, but legality is all about picking nits and the difference in meaning is clear. ![]() The first states that a specific cat is being collected, the second that one cat- but not one in particular- is being collected. For example, "I'm going to the pound to collect the cat" versus "I'm going to the pound to collect a cat". Indeed, grammatically the use of "a" does mean that there are more than one option or you wouldn't use "a" but "the". Phasmid: As for the rest, we received a free portrait pack as advertised. It's pretty much the same situation for Thronebreaker being "GOG exclusive" but now on Steam or every sale anywhere ever having discounts up to whatever the maximum discount for a single item is- semantically and legally it's accurate but it's open to misinterpretation. That's an inherent problem with up/ down vote systems, they're a measure of popularity, not of validity or quality.Īs for the rest, we received a free portrait pack as advertised. ![]() Your problem there is not accuracy, it's that every single non US person on the internet has met someone online who insists that everyone else is subject to US laws. Yes, but downvote wise it doesn't matter if what you say is true if it's something people don't like, people get downvoted for stating unpopular facts all the time. GOG does have to adhere to US law when it comes to US customers. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |